u-ct micro-ct scanner Search Results


micro computed tomography micro ct scanner  (MILabs)
97
MILabs micro computed tomography micro ct scanner
Sr-SLA implants promoted bone formation. (A) Representative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of SLA and Sr-SLA surfaces (scale bars = 5 μm, 1 μm, and 250 nm). (B) Energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometry (EDS) spectra of SLA and Sr-SLA surfaces. (C) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) patterns of SLA and Sr-SLA surfaces. <t>(D)</t> <t>Micro-computed</t> tomography <t>(micro-CT)</t> evaluation of bone regeneration in the SLA and Sr-SLA groups at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation (the pink area indicates new bone formation). n = 6 mice per group and per time point. (E) Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) of regenerated tissues surrounding implants at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation in each group. (F) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of paraffin sections in the SLA and Sr-SLA groups at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation (scale bar = 500 μm at low magnification, scale bar = 200 μm at high magnification). n = 5 mice per group and per time point. (G) New bone area of regenerated tissues surrounding implants at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation in each group. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; **** P < 0.0001.
Micro Computed Tomography Micro Ct Scanner, supplied by MILabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/u-ct+micro-ct+scanner/Computed+Tomography/pmc12641163-60-22-26
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
micro computed tomography micro ct scanner - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
microct scanner u-ct 35  (SCANCO USA INC)
90
SCANCO USA INC microct scanner u-ct 35
<t>MicroCT</t> images used to determine mode of failure after push-out testing. Crushing of the metal implant proximally occurred during push-out testing in a small pore titanium foam implant at 6 weeks (A). During push-out testing, a sintered beaded implant failed proximally within the bone (B) and a small pore titanium foam implant failed distally within the bone; both had been in vivo for 6 weeks. A large pore titanium foam implant in vivo for 12 weeks, failed at the bone-implant interface (D) during push-out testing.
Microct Scanner U Ct 35, supplied by SCANCO USA INC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/u-ct+micro-ct+scanner/micro+ct/pmc02860654-157-17-21
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microct scanner u-ct 35 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
orthopeadics-bone-and-musculoskeletal  (MILabs)
99
MILabs orthopeadics-bone-and-musculoskeletal
<t>MicroCT</t> images used to determine mode of failure after push-out testing. Crushing of the metal implant proximally occurred during push-out testing in a small pore titanium foam implant at 6 weeks (A). During push-out testing, a sintered beaded implant failed proximally within the bone (B) and a small pore titanium foam implant failed distally within the bone; both had been in vivo for 6 weeks. A large pore titanium foam implant in vivo for 12 weeks, failed at the bone-implant interface (D) during push-out testing.
Orthopeadics Bone And Musculoskeletal, supplied by MILabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/u-ct+micro-ct+scanner/orthopeadics-bone-and-musculoskeletal/custom%40orthopeadics-bone-and-musculoskeletal%4041023316
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
orthopeadics-bone-and-musculoskeletal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
uct 80 micro-ct  (SCANCO USA INC)
90
SCANCO USA INC uct 80 micro-ct
<t>MicroCT</t> images used to determine mode of failure after push-out testing. Crushing of the metal implant proximally occurred during push-out testing in a small pore titanium foam implant at 6 weeks (A). During push-out testing, a sintered beaded implant failed proximally within the bone (B) and a small pore titanium foam implant failed distally within the bone; both had been in vivo for 6 weeks. A large pore titanium foam implant in vivo for 12 weeks, failed at the bone-implant interface (D) during push-out testing.
Uct 80 Micro Ct, supplied by SCANCO USA INC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/u-ct+micro-ct+scanner/uct50/pm23109268-89-32-31
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
uct 80 micro-ct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
uct-40 scanner  (SCANCO USA INC)
90
SCANCO USA INC uct-40 scanner
<t>MicroCT</t> images used to determine mode of failure after push-out testing. Crushing of the metal implant proximally occurred during push-out testing in a small pore titanium foam implant at 6 weeks (A). During push-out testing, a sintered beaded implant failed proximally within the bone (B) and a small pore titanium foam implant failed distally within the bone; both had been in vivo for 6 weeks. A large pore titanium foam implant in vivo for 12 weeks, failed at the bone-implant interface (D) during push-out testing.
Uct 40 Scanner, supplied by SCANCO USA INC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/u-ct+micro-ct+scanner/uct40+desktop+scanner/pm32145672-77-24-26
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
uct-40 scanner - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
vivact 80 scanner  (SCANCO USA INC)
90
SCANCO USA INC vivact 80 scanner
<t>MicroCT</t> images used to determine mode of failure after push-out testing. Crushing of the metal implant proximally occurred during push-out testing in a small pore titanium foam implant at 6 weeks (A). During push-out testing, a sintered beaded implant failed proximally within the bone (B) and a small pore titanium foam implant failed distally within the bone; both had been in vivo for 6 weeks. A large pore titanium foam implant in vivo for 12 weeks, failed at the bone-implant interface (D) during push-out testing.
Vivact 80 Scanner, supplied by SCANCO USA INC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/u-ct+micro-ct+scanner/vivact+40+scanner/bio_rxiv__2021__09__08__459303-168-19-25
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vivact 80 scanner - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
inveon ct  (Siemens AG)
90
Siemens AG inveon ct
<t>MicroCT</t> images used to determine mode of failure after push-out testing. Crushing of the metal implant proximally occurred during push-out testing in a small pore titanium foam implant at 6 weeks (A). During push-out testing, a sintered beaded implant failed proximally within the bone (B) and a small pore titanium foam implant failed distally within the bone; both had been in vivo for 6 weeks. A large pore titanium foam implant in vivo for 12 weeks, failed at the bone-implant interface (D) during push-out testing.
Inveon Ct, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/u-ct+micro-ct+scanner/inveon+research+workplace+software/pmc10172263__11307_2022_1790_MOESM1_ESM-68-72-103
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
inveon ct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
x-cube  (MOLECUBES NV)
90
MOLECUBES NV x-cube
<t>MicroCT</t> images used to determine mode of failure after push-out testing. Crushing of the metal implant proximally occurred during push-out testing in a small pore titanium foam implant at 6 weeks (A). During push-out testing, a sintered beaded implant failed proximally within the bone (B) and a small pore titanium foam implant failed distally within the bone; both had been in vivo for 6 weeks. A large pore titanium foam implant in vivo for 12 weeks, failed at the bone-implant interface (D) during push-out testing.
X Cube, supplied by MOLECUBES NV, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/u-ct+micro-ct+scanner/x+cube/pmc10172263__11307_2022_1790_MOESM1_ESM-68-181-180
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
x-cube - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Sr-SLA implants promoted bone formation. (A) Representative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of SLA and Sr-SLA surfaces (scale bars = 5 μm, 1 μm, and 250 nm). (B) Energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometry (EDS) spectra of SLA and Sr-SLA surfaces. (C) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) patterns of SLA and Sr-SLA surfaces. (D) Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) evaluation of bone regeneration in the SLA and Sr-SLA groups at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation (the pink area indicates new bone formation). n = 6 mice per group and per time point. (E) Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) of regenerated tissues surrounding implants at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation in each group. (F) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of paraffin sections in the SLA and Sr-SLA groups at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation (scale bar = 500 μm at low magnification, scale bar = 200 μm at high magnification). n = 5 mice per group and per time point. (G) New bone area of regenerated tissues surrounding implants at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation in each group. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; **** P < 0.0001.

Journal: Biomaterials Research

Article Title: The Strontium Ion Reprograms Monocyte Subsets via TRPM2 Channel Regulation to Enhance Osseointegration

doi: 10.34133/bmr.0286

Figure Lengend Snippet: Sr-SLA implants promoted bone formation. (A) Representative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of SLA and Sr-SLA surfaces (scale bars = 5 μm, 1 μm, and 250 nm). (B) Energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometry (EDS) spectra of SLA and Sr-SLA surfaces. (C) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) patterns of SLA and Sr-SLA surfaces. (D) Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) evaluation of bone regeneration in the SLA and Sr-SLA groups at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation (the pink area indicates new bone formation). n = 6 mice per group and per time point. (E) Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) of regenerated tissues surrounding implants at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation in each group. (F) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of paraffin sections in the SLA and Sr-SLA groups at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation (scale bar = 500 μm at low magnification, scale bar = 200 μm at high magnification). n = 5 mice per group and per time point. (G) New bone area of regenerated tissues surrounding implants at 3, 7, and 14 d after implantation in each group. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; **** P < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Mouse tibia containing implants were collected and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Beyotime, P0099) for 48 h. Analysis was performed using a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanner (MILabs, The Netherlands).

Techniques: Electron Microscopy, Spectroscopy, Micro-CT, Staining

Monocyte depletion impaired new bone formation. (A) Workflow of the experiments on monocyte depletion. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of cells stained by CD11b and Ly6G in the control and clodronate liposome (CLL) groups. n = 6 mice per group. (C) Statistical analysis of CD11b + Ly6G − cells in the control and CLL groups. (D) Micro-CT evaluation of bone regeneration in control and CLL groups at 7 and 14 d after implantation (the purple area indicates new bone formation). n = 6 mice per group and per time point. (E) BV/TV and Tb.Th of regenerated tissues surrounding implants 7 and 14 d after implantation in each group. (F) H&E staining of paraffin sections in the control and CLL groups 7 and 14 d after implantation (scale bar = 500 μm at low magnification, scale bar = 200 μm at high magnification). n = 5 mice per group and per time point. (G) New bone area of regenerated tissues surrounding implants 7 and 14 d after implantation in each group. ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. FCM, flow cytometry.

Journal: Biomaterials Research

Article Title: The Strontium Ion Reprograms Monocyte Subsets via TRPM2 Channel Regulation to Enhance Osseointegration

doi: 10.34133/bmr.0286

Figure Lengend Snippet: Monocyte depletion impaired new bone formation. (A) Workflow of the experiments on monocyte depletion. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of cells stained by CD11b and Ly6G in the control and clodronate liposome (CLL) groups. n = 6 mice per group. (C) Statistical analysis of CD11b + Ly6G − cells in the control and CLL groups. (D) Micro-CT evaluation of bone regeneration in control and CLL groups at 7 and 14 d after implantation (the purple area indicates new bone formation). n = 6 mice per group and per time point. (E) BV/TV and Tb.Th of regenerated tissues surrounding implants 7 and 14 d after implantation in each group. (F) H&E staining of paraffin sections in the control and CLL groups 7 and 14 d after implantation (scale bar = 500 μm at low magnification, scale bar = 200 μm at high magnification). n = 5 mice per group and per time point. (G) New bone area of regenerated tissues surrounding implants 7 and 14 d after implantation in each group. ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. FCM, flow cytometry.

Article Snippet: Mouse tibia containing implants were collected and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Beyotime, P0099) for 48 h. Analysis was performed using a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanner (MILabs, The Netherlands).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Staining, Control, Micro-CT

MicroCT images used to determine mode of failure after push-out testing. Crushing of the metal implant proximally occurred during push-out testing in a small pore titanium foam implant at 6 weeks (A). During push-out testing, a sintered beaded implant failed proximally within the bone (B) and a small pore titanium foam implant failed distally within the bone; both had been in vivo for 6 weeks. A large pore titanium foam implant in vivo for 12 weeks, failed at the bone-implant interface (D) during push-out testing.

Journal:

Article Title: Osseointegration into a Novel Titanium Foam Implant in the Distal Femur of a Rabbit

doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31541

Figure Lengend Snippet: MicroCT images used to determine mode of failure after push-out testing. Crushing of the metal implant proximally occurred during push-out testing in a small pore titanium foam implant at 6 weeks (A). During push-out testing, a sintered beaded implant failed proximally within the bone (B) and a small pore titanium foam implant failed distally within the bone; both had been in vivo for 6 weeks. A large pore titanium foam implant in vivo for 12 weeks, failed at the bone-implant interface (D) during push-out testing.

Article Snippet: MicroCT Failure Analysis After push-out testing, a subset of 27 femurs (n=3/implant/time point) were imaged in a microCT (Scanner u-CT 35, Scanco Medical, Switzerland) using the following operating conditions: 70 kVp, 114 μA, integration time 300 ms, and resolution 37 μm.

Techniques: In Vivo